Creating a Program (for March 10, 2013)

March 7th, 2013

One of the challenges of organizing a performance is to decide what to play and what order to play it in.

At the 2013 Chicago Bass Festival, we played a short concert. And I mean, really, short. When we got done and I looked at my watch, I realized that we would not have a full set for the March 10 performance. So we added a couple of pieces.

At our last rehearsal, I wanted to make sure we would have a program of a decent length. So I sketched out the pieces in what I think is a good order, and timed each piece as we ran through it. Add ’em up and we’re just under an hour of music. (See the column of figures in the picture below.) With some conversation in between pieces, this will be a nice concert.

Program for March 10, sketched out on the blackboard in our rehearsal space

Program for March 10, sketched out on the blackboard in our rehearsal space

The other aspect of a program is to try to have a nice flow from beginning to end. “Wildebeests and Warthogs” by Dan Armstrong is fun way to open the concert. It will show the versatility and flexibility of our instruments, and probably many audience members will be surprised at how nimble we can be. It’s a good opener.

Next, we move to transcriptions of motets by Tomas Luis da Victoria. This is a super sharp jump in style from “Wildebeests.” Arranged for bass quartet by Michael Cameron, these three motets will sound great in a nice resonant space.

As it turns out, one motif in this concert will be the movement across time — meaning across the eras in which pieces are written. Jan Alm‘s Kvartett is a contemporary piece, published in  1988. That’s followed up by the tender and short Lullaby by contemporary composer Paul Ramsier.

The peaceful mood laid out by Lullaby is however, short-lived. Because Teppo Hauta-Aho‘s Why? is a dark and brooding lament. It may be a bit of a shock! So we will probably insert a short period of conversation with the organizer of Sounds of the South Loop, Kim Diehnelt to put some space between these pieces.

Why? is so emotionally intense that I want to offset its impact before going on. At the Bass Festival, I programmed Lullaby to follow Why?. But I’ll be honest with you, that combination was really draining. I said as much from the stage at the festival. So this time, I’m following Why? with a transcription of a Georg Philipp Telemann sonata for four violins (TWV 40:202). It has the kind of motoric rhythm and simple, classical harmonies that should serve as an antidote for the passion of Teppo’s piece.

If you look at the image on the blackboard (yes, the Chicago Waldorf School is kind enough to let us use their music room as a rehearsal space, and they have big, beautiful blackboards, lovingly seasoned by the teachers–yes, there is an art to seasoning a blackboard, but that’s not our subject now), you’ll see “Fugues 9, 5.” Joel DiBartolo arranged two fugues from Bach’s second Well-Tempered Clavier. Since number five has a motif very very similar to the final movement of the Telemann sonata, I decided during our rehearsal to play the ninth fugue before the fifth, in order to avoid a repetitive feeling.

Finally, we’re reprising Tony Osborne‘s Rocket Man, a piece the Chicago Bass Ensemble had a hand in commissioning, and which we premiered last month. Due to its high energy and virtuosic playing, it’s a good closer!

So, that is a summary of my thinking behind the program. I’m posting this at 9:30 pm on Thursday, and haven’t taken the time to link all the pieces — though most of them do have links somewhere on the web. If you read this before I get back and add all the detail, you can enjoy finding more information via our friends at Google. I do intend to get back here shortly and add more links for you.

Cheers! I hope you enjoy Sounds of the South Loop on March 10!

– Jacque

 

(updated 8 March, 2013, with links for most of the composers, arrangers and pieces. Many links selected using the “hmm, that looks good even though I didn’t read it” method. You may use your discretion when following and reading.)

IKEA Studio Transformation

March 5th, 2013

I have to admit to some jealousy and some inspiration from this post about IKEA’s transformation of DJ Harry Love’s working space.

My working space isn’t quite as cluttered as that, but it is cluttered enough to be a psychic energy sink, a place where creative ideas gasp and sputter for air.

I’m fortunate to have Linda Parks nearby here in Chicago, and I plan a session with her the week after our concert at 2nd Presbyterian so I can get cleared up! Linda focuses on using what you have, not on spending a fortune on new furniture, but after seeing that video, I wonder if spending some money isn’t the right thing to do.

Do you have a transformative story to tell about your working space? Let me know in the comments.

Second Presbyterian Church Chicago – March 10, 2013

February 8th, 2013

We’ll be playing at the Second Presbyterian Church, March 10, 2013.

2:30 pm

1936 S. Michigan Ave.
Chicago, IL 60616
312.225.4951

This is the first season of a new music series at Second Presbyterian, Sounds of the South Loop. We’re honored to be a part of it!

Suggested donation ranges from $8 for seniors buying online up to $18 for non-seniors at the door. Follow the link above.

Program:

  • Dan Armstrong’s “Wildebeests and Warthogs”
  • “Three Spanish Motets” by Tomas Luis de Victoria, arranged by Michael Cameron
  • Jan Alm’s “Quartet #1”
  • Paul Ramsier’s “Lullaby”
  • Teppa Hauta-Aho’s “Why?”
  • Telemann’s Concerto #2 in D for four Violins — arranged for four basses in G
  • Two Bach Fugues arranged by Joel DiBartolo
  • Tony Osborne’s “Rocket Man”

I’ve written some thoughts about creating a program.

We’re also honored to have Michael Cameron joining us for this concert. Michael is a tremendous bassist. He has performed with many great ensembles and composers, and has a number of recordings to his name. And, if you were reading carefully above, you’ll see that he is an arranger and composer as well. You can read his full bio on his website. All you need to know now is what kind of car he drives, which you can find on our website.

Please visit this post again to learn of any updates to the program.

(Posted Friday, February 8; updated February 27; updated March 6 and 7)

Northside Youth Symphony, January 31, 2013

January 28th, 2013

A quickie update to our schedule – John Floeter, Hans Peterman and I will be performing as guest artists at the Northside Youth Symphony concert on January 31, 2013.

It’s a bit of a warm-up for our performance on Sunday at the Chicago Bass Festival (but different repertoire, if course).

Northside Youth Symphony
5501 N. Kedzie, Chicago

7:00 pm

We will perform

  • Lee Kesselman’s Basses Three
  • Jan Alm’s Trio in D
  • some other short trio pieces, from Bernard Salles collection.

 

Chicago Bass Festival – 2013

January 9th, 2013

We’ll be playing at the Chicago Bass Festival on February 3, 2013. Our performance will take place at 2:00 pm.

The festival itself runs from 9:00 am to 5:00 pm. Registration information can be found at the link above, or go directly to the registration page. Registration costs $100 (save $25 if you register before January 30).*

Bennett-Gordon Hall at the Ravinia Festival grounds in Highland Park.

We’ll be playing:

What’s the theme for this concert? Ummm, mostly I guess it’s “living composers!”

“Why?” is a dark, brooding lament written in memory of Ovidiu Badila.

“Rocket Man” is one of two pieces composed by Tony Osborne during 2012, a joint commission sponsored in part by the Chicago Bass Ensemble. No, it’s not about David Bowie or Werner von Braun, its accelerating rhythms are in honor of Robert Stephenson, an engineer who designed the “Rocket” steam locomotive. According to the publisher, this is the premiere performance of this work.

It wasn’t until doing research for this post that I learned of the passing of Joel DiBartolo, longtime Tonight Show bassist, who made many arrangements for bass ensembles. Two we’ll perform are fugues from Book Two of J.S. Bach’s Well-Tempered Clavier, nos. 5 and 9. If you’ll tolerate a bit of irony, this dead composer and dead arranger are the exception on this program. Of course, we’re honored by the contributions of both to our musical world.

Likely to follow “Why?” in the program, “Lullaby” is a sweet, simple little lullaby. It will be a nice tonic to the much darker piece. Ramsier has written a lot of music for the double bass, including pieces performed often by Gary Karr. Here’s an interview as part of the Contrabass Conversations series. “Lullaby” is available as a piece for bass and piano, as well as a version for bass and orchestra, but I’m told that the original conception is for bass quartet.

Once upon a time published by Discordia Music, “Wildebeests and Warthogs” is snappy, challenging and fun. The notes refer to an in-joke in the composer’s family. Dan has previously been a clinician at the Chicago Bass Festival.

 

* If you’re a fan of ours, and really can’t make it to our March 10 concert, talk to me, maybe I can get you a pass to the festival.

Press Release Time!

December 8th, 2012

A very brief post today (first in a while, I concede).

Right now I’m frantically trying to compose a few blurbs for upcoming concerts:

Writing these promotional things is often a bit of a challenge for myself, because I leave them for too long, and then don’t save the ones I’ve written, for re-use. Dumb!

Struggling Artist or Rock Star: Why Only Two Choices?

November 3rd, 2012

A recent article about Cat Power has fueled my thinking about the pigeonholing of artists — both by themselves and others.

I often find I’ve put myself in the trap of thinking that there only two choices: “I’m a starving artist” or “I’m a Rock Star”? That somehow I have to either scrimp and pinch and struggle, or have wild, incredible fame and fortune, and that there’s no in-between. That’s pretty much what the author of the Atlantic Wire article about Cat Power has decided.

But these statements by David Wagner are clearly oversimplifications:

  • “It’s no shock to learn that musicians lead financially precarious lives”
  • “Everyone knows that artists go out on a financial limb by committing to creativity as a career.”

These two statements are FALSE. I know plenty of musicians who make their living playing or teaching music, and live in houses and have mortgages and cars and kids in school. That is, they lead fairly plain, solid “middle-class” lives. No drama. But that’s not an exciting or interesting story, so who’s going to write about it?

Cat Power’s story, essentially about a person making a living but encountering health problems for which they can’t find or possibly afford care, would not be the subject of a news article or even an opinion piece if she were simply a sales clerk at a convenience store, or a bank teller. Imagine the tweet “MAY HAVE TO MISS WORK THIS WEEK ON ACCOUNT OF MIGRAINES AND ASTHMA.” Inspiration for a magazine cover? I don’t think so.

Sidebar: Steve Lawson has also written a brief post in response to the David Wagner article: http://www.stevelawson.net/2012/10/indie-or-not-who-gets-the-money/ .

My perception is we’re in a culture that idolizes extremes and isn’t interested in middles. But let’s not digress to politics.

Back to the personal intent I had in writing this post. And that is to briefly explore my attitude towards the work of creating and leading this chamber music group, the Chicago Bass Ensemble. I think I’ve found myself ensnared by the myth that a struggling artist is a great artist. And as a result, I put roadblocks in my own way, so it will look to me like I am struggling and therefore deserve to be great. Examples:

  • Music reading sessions like the one I led last month. Yes, musician’s schedules don’t always line up easily. But tools like Doodle, Google Calendar and PHPList e-mail make it actually pretty simple to find a date. And speaking personally, even finding a space isn’t a HUGE deal. So why do I let months and months go by without setting up reading sessions? So I can have something to complain about! Look, ma! I’m struggling!
  • Finding new music. I agonize about finding music to play (Ma! This such a struggle!). But my friend Dave pointed out to me the other day that I should be able to find and listen to pieces via YouTube. Of course! Duh! Or as Lou Mallozzi at Experimental Sound Studio sometimes encourages me to do, sponsor a call for compositions. It’s just not that hard.
  • Practice. Here’s the deal here: I do NOT currently make a comfortable cozy living as a musician. I work a day job. And I have a family. So, yes, finding time for extended and detailed work in the practice room can be a scheduling problem. But I can, and do, fit in 10 or 15 minutes almost every day (and thanks to Lift, I track it–and my flossing–so I know that in the last 7 weeks, I’ve checked in on “Practice Musical Instrument” 39 times). No struggle, just do it!
  • Getting, and publicizing, performances. Well, I haven’t found the silver bullet on this one yet. I haven’t put in the work to get well-known to presenters and organizations. And I haven’t gone whole-hog on the self-presenting thing yet. Probably the struggle here is just to decide on a course of action: self-promote, or pursue presenters, or just record, or …? Not having a clear direction in mind makes it very hard to take action! So, I’m deluding myself if I say getting gigs is a struggle. Committing to a course of action is what’s needed.

So I started this post off talking about a misdirected view that we have of artists: that they either struggle or live in mansions. I don’t think that is true. I think there are artists who are able to create their art and enjoy their lives, neither crushed under the heel of callous misfortune nor cavorting with the lotus-eaters. Personally, I have fallen into the trap of equating struggle with artistic success. And I am writing this post to force myself, publicly, in front of both of you who read and comment on this blog, to admit that my life just isn’t that hard and I can be successful, even if it doesn’t require struggle to achieve my goals.

 

Reading Session – October 2012

October 14th, 2012

Getting ready for a reading session this late afternoon – John Floeter, Josh Harrison, Hans Peterman, and I, possibly joined by Anton Hatwich, are getting together to read through some of the music that I’ve been acquiring.

I’m particularly interested to have a go at a couple of pieces that I had a hand in commissioning: Tony Osborne’s Rocket Man and Harrison’s Clocks were both completed earlier this year. (I had hoped to premiere Harrison’s Clocks at the Make Music Chicago event, but that was not to be.)

Other stuff I’ve got in my hands for tonight:

  • Two Bach fugues arranged by Joel DiBartolo
  • Four Elizabethan trios also arranged by Joel DiBartolo
  • Paganini’s Moses Fantasy and François Rabbath’s Kobolds arranged by Klaus Trumpf
  • Madrigal, Cancíon e Recercada by Diego Ortiz, arranged by Klaus Stoll
  • Mozart’s Adagio K. 411 arranged by Carolyn White
  • Ron Wasserman’s Pieces for Basses
  • Paul Ramsier’s Lullaby

I’ll write up some comments below after we’re done!

UPDATED

Alright, we had a good reading session. Well done all around – thanks Josh, John and Hans for coming out!

We started off with Lullaby by Paul Ramsier. Paul had sent me a copy of this piece a while back, saying that it’s been recorded for solo bass on small orchestra, but that the original conception of it was for bass quartet. It’s a very lovely short piece. We read it well enough that I switched on my Zoom H4 recorder, so that we could send the composer a recording. Doubtful the performance was so good that we’d publish it, though. It won’t take too much work, however, to make this piece ready for a performance.

Next we took on Harrison’s Clocks. I enjoyed this piece very much. It feels like good writing for basses, and I think it will be quite approachable for audiences. (At this point in our reading session, the rest of the guys were starting to think I was cheating: I had told them that we were literally reading cold — no preparation, but in fact I had been working a little bit on both these pieces earlier in the year. And even though we drew straws (figuratively) for part assignment, I had the bass 1 part for both, and since I wasn’t really sight reading, I sounded better than I should have.)

Then we had a go at Rocket Man. Since these two pieces were composed at about the same time, earlier this year, it should be no surprise that they had a certain feel in common. In particular, the opening chords felt very much the same. That felt a bit funny (didn’t we just play this?) but as we went along, the challenges presented by Rocket Man were clearly different. I won’t program them back to back, and maybe not even on the same performance. But I look forward to performing both.

Just to wind down, we pulled up one of the two Bach fugues (Number 5 from the Well-Tempered Clavier). Ah, Bach. So deceptively simple looking, so rich and hard to play in a truly musical way. We barreled through our first time, but it became clear at the end that we were. not. together. We looked it over a bit, realizing that the entrances of the fugue subject were not always in the same place in the bar, and that the stretto was particularly “uneven,” and had another go. This time we were able to end on together (hooray). But at the same time, it was clear that we had not realized anywhere near the music that is in that piece. I’ve been there before.

We wrapped up after that. About two hours of good work, reading through music, and enjoying the opportunity to play together. We’ll plan to do it again soon. There’s plenty of music left!

Wrap-up: Chicago Bass Festival

September 29th, 2012

Gadzooks! This particular blog post has been nothing but a title, saved in “draft” mode for more than 7 months.

We (Anton, Pat, Dan and I) had a good time playing at the Chicago Bass Festival. Attendance was lighter than it had been at the inaugural festival two years age, and the audience for our performance was pretty spare. But–not to say having an audience isn’t important, but–we had other things on our mind:

The part of our contribution that I was most excited about was our performance of Mike Wittgraf’s Autogenous Mining, a piece composed for us. For double bass quartet and interactive electronics, each bass is mic’d and the sound from the basses triggers samples and effects on KYMA X software and a Pacarana sound synthesizer. The computer operator affects the sound and processing using a Wii remote and nunchuk. The title refers to the process of “self-mining” the strings of the bass for different sounds.

A recording of Autogenous Mining from the Bass Festival is now available on SoundCloud. I wrote about the piece in other blog posts as well.

Our program for the performance was as described in my post announcing it.

Goals and Visions

September 21st, 2012

Those of you who know me personally will know that I work, by day, as a coach to companies using agile methodology to build software (see Redpoint’s website as well as my new blog). I’ve been reading Chet Richards book “Certain to Win,” which applies the strategies of USAF Col. John Boyd to business. Chapter IV, and pages 76-78 specifically discuss the importance of goals that are understood by the participants and a compelling mission.

Fairly standard stuff, I think for someone who’s been involved with a large enterprise in the last twenty years. But Richards’ book got me thinking: what about the Chicago Bass Ensemble is so unifying, exciting and compelling that players will be inspired to join me?

Because to be honest with you, the last 18 months or so for this group have been–except for the period in January and February 2012 where we had three performances–unproductive and uninteresting. Part of that is because of my own busy-ness with work (for instance, starting with Redpoint in March), but I think there is also some deeper/larger issue.

For instance, periodically I send an e-mail to a list of bass players I know, inviting them to join me in reading through bass ensemble literature. It’s always a bit difficult to find a time when everyone can get together–everybody’s busy, of course–but the response to my last invite was really dreadful, actually: only one person took the time to respond (you know who you are, and thank you!!). It makes me think: what I’m doing must not appeal to anyone else out there.

But that can’t be!

What I’m doing is very cool stuff. I just haven’t properly communicated it. And as trite as it might sound to those of you who are jaded business professionals, I need to craft a statement of my vision–my Vision–for the Chicago Bass Ensemble.

I’m going to use this post, and its comments, to start to try out statements about what I want this group to be. Your comments, thoughts, observations ARE very much welcomed.

Chicago Bass Ensemble Vision Statements – draft, with comments

  • to provide bass players an opportunity to perform high-quality chamber music [good, but generic]
  • to promote to the public the bass as an instrument, and the bass ensemble as an interesting group [high-falutin’?]
  • to demonstrate the bass as a serious, dramatic and exciting instrument [urgh, tedious language]
  • to bring the bass from the back of the orchestra to a starring role [too much negative connotation of the bass’ current role]
  • to present high-quality and dramatic chamber music [I like the breadth of this statement, it’s about music, not ‘bass music’]
  • to showcase…
  • to explore…
  • to dispel the myth of the bass as a clumsy low cousin [hahahahaha]
  • to have fun…
  • to challenge myself and other bass players to practice and perform at our highest level of ability and musicianship

What do YOU think? Are any of these statements more meaningful than others? Leave your comments . . .

Jacque